網2.0去1.0太?
張貼在2008年8月7日在5:29上午
Wikipedia告訴我們網2.0是:
網技術和打算,最著名地,提高創造性、信息公用,并且合作在用戶之中的網絡設計。 這些概念導致了基於互聯網的社區的發展和演變和主機服務,例如社會網絡站點, wikis、blogs和folksonomies。
所有聽起來強大罰款,合作是好,創造性是好,它是所有好,直到您嘗試并且使用一個網2.0站點在緩慢的互聯網連接的時間。 讓我們不使用最少相當數量網絡資源忘記整體想法在HTTP協議之後是存在數據在一個小型客戶端裡面,可能。
我在軟件開發產業幾乎度過了一個十年,并且我可以告訴您那時,我們曾經工作到小公分母,特點集合為新的軟件將是由要求定義的,不由什麼是質樸的,我們限制了系統資源可利用對我們,因此我們確定我們沒有浪費其中任一。 我不能幫助,但是相信一般的網設計師就是那些日子不關心人的大百分比在地球附近沒有肥胖帶寬寬頻連接的好處。
Facebook,所有網2.0的祖父可能選址,接收3分鐘裝載主頁橫跨我的撥號連接,您是否認為我實際上麻煩使用它? 并且我不是單獨的在我有限的互聯網連接,我知道在一條半英里半徑必須現在仍然使用撥號我之內的許多人。
一個慢裝貨站點本身不是問題,只要小的狀態欄移動,并且我們有某一方式知道我們仍然等待數據,并且它是事例是患者權利? 錯誤! 那麼許多2.0站點也包括AJAX功能入他們的頁的網,當AJAX刷新,瀏覽器做,沒有狀態顯示,沒有轉動的像,它正義顯示,完整裝載直到AJAX更新實際上出現。
這意味著為有些站點,我每次被留下開會等待的分鐘,沒有任何根本實際上發生的實際視覺徵兆,這是不能接受的。
好,因此這一點誇大其詞是否是,但,當軟件產業開始投入視覺和樣式平原老實用性? 我不關心多麼俏麗您的網站看,如果需要我10分鐘對註冊, 8,其中我用但願的我的坐希望我的連接未垂懸,沒有方式知道任何是否發生,我就是不使用您的站點。
You may have heard the old K.I.S.S adage, Keep It Simple Stupid, this had been a mantra for software developers for several decades, which now seems to have been thrown out of the window by this “brave new world” of Web 2.0. Quite frankly, if something can be done in flat HTML, why do it any other way?
When developers started rolling out flash enabled sites several years ago, they were polite enough to give low bandwidth visitors a non-flash site as an option, not so with Web 2.0 sites.
So what do you think? Is good looking better than usable? Would you rather have cool features you will never used instead of a responsive and robust browsing experience? I know which I prefer.
This is a guest post by Mac Wheeler, who currently lives and works in Thailand.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
» Filed Under IT In Life
Related Posts
- Make your own AJAX progress bar
- Speed up Internet browsing with Propel Accelerator
- Create custom bookmarks of your favorite web sites using only2clicks
- Clicky - Web Analytics Tool for Your Website
- Izimi - Share any file on your computer instantly by turning your computer into a web server

























I wholeheartedly agree; unfortunately though, fluff and the Joneses has become a mainstay of American (at least) culture. What bothers me just as much is Microsoft’s policy on activeX & Silverlight … the user can globally allow, disallow, or permit prompting of such, but cannot selectively set permissions (no to 3rd party, always for suchsuch.com) for sites.
To be honest, I can’t think of a single person I know who still uses dial up internet, just as I haven’t seen advertisements for the service for a number of years now, and that’s in Australia, and we have pretty shocking internet services.
I would assume anyone still using dial-up would most likely have little internet in web 2.0 type websites, and therefore it would not be too much of an issue.
However I do there should be more of a focus on making sites smaller and load faster, if just to save bandwidth somewhat.