网2.0去1.0太？
张贴在2008年8月7日在5:29上午
Wikipedia告诉我们网2.0是：
网技术和打算，最著名地，提高创造性、信息公用，并且合作在用户之中的网络设计。 这些概念导致了基于互联网的社区的发展和演变和主机服务，例如社会网络站点， wikis、blogs和folksonomies。
所有听起来强大罚款，合作是好，创造性是好，它是所有好，直到您尝试并且使用一个网2.0站点在缓慢的互联网连接的时间。 让我们不使用最少相当数量网络资源忘记整体想法在HTTP协议之后是存在数据在一个小型客户端里面，可能。
我在软件开发产业几乎度过了一个十年，并且我可以告诉您那时，我们曾经工作到小公分母，特点集合为新的软件将是由要求定义的，不由什么是质朴的，我们限制了系统资源可利用对我们，因此我们确定我们没有浪费其中任一。 我不能帮助，但是相信一般的网设计师就是那些日子不关心人的大百分比在地球附近没有肥胖带宽宽频连接的好处。
Facebook，所有网2.0的祖父可能选址，接收3分钟装载主页横跨我的拨号连接，您是否认为我实际上麻烦使用它？ 并且我不是单独的在我有限的互联网连接，我知道在一条半英里半径必须现在仍然使用拨号我之内的许多人。
一个慢装货站点本身不是问题，只要小的状态栏移动，并且我们有某一方式知道我们仍然等待数据，并且它是事例是患者权利？ 错误! 那么许多2.0站点也包括AJAX功能入他们的页的网，当AJAX刷新，浏览器做，没有状态显示，没有转动的像，它正义显示，完整装载直到AJAX更新实际上出现。
这意味着为有些站点，我每次被留下开会等待的分钟，没有任何根本实际上发生的实际视觉征兆，这是不能接受的。
好，因此这一点夸大其词是否是，但，当软件产业开始投入视觉和样式平原老实用性？ 我不关心多么俏丽您的网站看，如果需要我10分钟对注册， 8，其中我用但愿的我的坐希望我的连接未垂悬，没有方式知道任何是否发生，我就是不使用您的站点。
You may have heard the old K.I.S.S adage, Keep It Simple Stupid, this had been a mantra for software developers for several decades, which now seems to have been thrown out of the window by this “brave new world” of Web 2.0. Quite frankly, if something can be done in flat HTML, why do it any other way?
When developers started rolling out flash enabled sites several years ago, they were polite enough to give low bandwidth visitors a non-flash site as an option, not so with Web 2.0 sites.
So what do you think? Is good looking better than usable? Would you rather have cool features you will never used instead of a responsive and robust browsing experience? I know which I prefer.
This is a guest post by Mac Wheeler, who currently lives and works in Thailand.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
» Filed Under IT In Life
Related Posts
- Make your own AJAX progress bar
- Speed up Internet browsing with Propel Accelerator
- Create custom bookmarks of your favorite web sites using only2clicks
- Clicky - Web Analytics Tool for Your Website
- Izimi - Share any file on your computer instantly by turning your computer into a web server
I wholeheartedly agree; unfortunately though, fluff and the Joneses has become a mainstay of American (at least) culture. What bothers me just as much is Microsoft’s policy on activeX & Silverlight … the user can globally allow, disallow, or permit prompting of such, but cannot selectively set permissions (no to 3rd party, always for suchsuch.com) for sites.
To be honest, I can’t think of a single person I know who still uses dial up internet, just as I haven’t seen advertisements for the service for a number of years now, and that’s in Australia, and we have pretty shocking internet services.
I would assume anyone still using dial-up would most likely have little internet in web 2.0 type websites, and therefore it would not be too much of an issue.
However I do there should be more of a focus on making sites smaller and load faster, if just to save bandwidth somewhat.