<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Web 2.0 gone 1.0 too far?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.online-tech-tips.com/it-in-life/has-web-20-gone-10-too-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.online-tech-tips.com/it-in-life/has-web-20-gone-10-too-far/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:59:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.online-tech-tips.com/it-in-life/has-web-20-gone-10-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-11075</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.online-tech-tips.com/?p=7079#comment-11075</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I can&#039;t think of a single person I know who still uses dial up internet, just as I haven&#039;t seen advertisements for the service for a number of years now, and that&#039;s in Australia, and we have pretty shocking internet services.

I would assume anyone still using dial-up would most likely have little internet in web 2.0 type websites, and therefore it would not be too much of an issue.

However I do there should be more of a focus on making sites smaller and load faster, if just to save bandwidth somewhat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I can&#8217;t think of a single person I know who still uses dial up internet, just as I haven&#8217;t seen advertisements for the service for a number of years now, and that&#8217;s in Australia, and we have pretty shocking internet services.</p>
<p>I would assume anyone still using dial-up would most likely have little internet in web 2.0 type websites, and therefore it would not be too much of an issue.</p>
<p>However I do there should be more of a focus on making sites smaller and load faster, if just to save bandwidth somewhat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grassBlade</title>
		<link>http://www.online-tech-tips.com/it-in-life/has-web-20-gone-10-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-11071</link>
		<dc:creator>grassBlade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.online-tech-tips.com/?p=7079#comment-11071</guid>
		<description>I wholeheartedly agree; unfortunately though, fluff and the Joneses has become a mainstay of American (at least) culture.  What bothers me just as much is Microsoft&#039;s policy on activeX &amp; Silverlight ... the user can globally allow, disallow, or permit prompting of such, but cannot selectively set permissions (no to 3rd party, always for suchsuch.com) for sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholeheartedly agree; unfortunately though, fluff and the Joneses has become a mainstay of American (at least) culture.  What bothers me just as much is Microsoft&#8217;s policy on activeX &amp; Silverlight &#8230; the user can globally allow, disallow, or permit prompting of such, but cannot selectively set permissions (no to 3rd party, always for suchsuch.com) for sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
